Sen. Kruse has introduced SB 373 concerning flags and god in public schools. He wants to mandate that a framed picture of a U.S. flag, a state flag, and the words “in God we Trust” be placed in every public school library and classroom. The entire display must be at least 14 x 17 inches with the motto being at least 4×15 and each flag being 5×5.
The bill also amends the current legislation permitting schools to offer a survey of religion class by specifying that the survey may include the study of the Bible as one of the permissible documents that may be studied in the survey. It does not specify any of the holy texts of other religions as eligible for study (although, under current law, the Bible and all of those other documents are already eligible for study.) The bill also states that a school corporation may mandate the teaching of creation science as one of the “various theories concerning the origin of life.”
Current law allows a parent to pull a kid from school to go receive religious instruction for two hours a week. This bill would allow the school to adopt a policy to award academic credit for that religious instruction. Finally, the legislation adds some happy talk about the liberty of the parent to direct the education of a child being a fundamental right and some strict scrutiny language to the effect that a school policy or state law can’t infringe upon that right unless it demonstrates the need for the policy or statute is “of the highest order and not otherwise served.”
This stuff about flags, “in God We Trust,” singling out the Bible for special mention, and Creation Science is about marking territory and isn’t calculated to improve kids’ educations. The policy giving credit for religious instruction actually doesn’t strike me as that bad as it’s written (how it worked in practice could be problematic.) The strict scrutiny language on a parent’s right to direct the kid’s education is ripe for unintended consequences and, beyond that, ignores the fact that the public also has an interest in an educated citizenry — exactly where and how we should draw the line where the parent’s interest and the public interest intersect is a tough question, worth more thought than this legislation reflects.
Stuart Swenson says
I suggest that the child of a parent who wants to claim “academic credit” for religious instruction performed by withdrawing the child from school be excluded from the testing database. The parent is interfering with the school’s efforts to educate the child and the public should not have to suffer the consequences for that behavior. It’s on the parent.
Carolyn Bonnell Neff says
Nice!
Jamie says
I teach at a public school in Indiana, and nearly every room has a framed picture that reads, “In God We Trust” over top an American flag. I took mine down because it is such a clear violation of the constitution and because I believe students are not in my classroom for religion. I think what kills me about this is that those who do want religion taught would probably not be OK with the particular kind if religion taught. Indeed, it’s the church that first demanded to take religion out of schools — they didn’t want a secular institution trying to somehow capture the word of god. In any case, we teachers will keep teaching despite all of this.
Doug Masson says
I expect you’re right. A couple of years ago, I did a sort of survey of Indiana History for the bicentennial and was surprised to find that there was a lot of bad blood between the Presbyterians and the Methodists with respect to education. If much in the way of religion gets into the classroom, it won’t be long before there are big disagreements about the type of religion to be taught.
Stuart says
Jamie, excellent move. In fact, the whole “In God we trust” thing is a cold war holdover dripping in civil religion, where folks like to combine politics and religion, ending with politics and religion that they wouldn’t want. If people take their religion seriously, it’s paganism. If they take their politics seriously, it’s polluting their politics. In my more Machieavellian moments, it would be fun to see prayer in schools just to watch the big fight over which prayer they would use and who would pray it–the Catholic teacher, the evangelical teacher, the atheist teacher, the Buddhist teacher, the Protestant who hasn’t seen the inside of a church for 20 years teacher, or who. People don’t seem to understand that we don’t have religion in schools for one huge reason: people don’t fight.