Because Kenn and Branden were talking about it, and I stumbled across an entertaining YouTube post on Creationism, Neanderthals, and mtDNA:
and, of course, I was looking for an excuse to post the picture of the kitten being threatened with a gun.
Masson's Blog
Because Kenn and Branden were talking about it, and I stumbled across an entertaining YouTube post on Creationism, Neanderthals, and mtDNA:
and, of course, I was looking for an excuse to post the picture of the kitten being threatened with a gun.
“That’s it. That’s their best shot,†said the Voice on the video.
Not true.
Video Voice pulls one quote from one literal-day creationist to make his point. Then, Voice presume (correctly, no doubt), that his viewers are in the dark regarding the creation science community.
Proof?
Video Voice points to Kent Hovind and Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis as the sole authorities on creationist views. Video Voice then cons you into believing that creationists embrace an odd notion that Neanderthal evolved from Noah.
Did he trick you into believing that (assuming you watched the video)?
Here’s the glitch.
Fazale R. Rana, Ph.D., a prominent creationist notes “Over the last five years, astonishing advances in ancient-DNA analysis have provided remarkable insight into Neanderthal genetics. As a result, the evolutionary connection between humans and Neanderthals has been severed.â€
http://www.reasons.org/resources/connections/2003v5n2/index.shtml#neanderthal_to_human_link_severed
Why did Video Voice not mention Dr. Rana? Is he wholly unaware of the substantial work of astrophysicist Dr. Hugh Ross? Might Video Voice be a redneck?
If you would be so kind as to go to this link
http://www.picosearch.com/cgi-bin/ts.pl
you will discover over 100 articles by creation scientists who will discredit Video Voices dishonest assertion that creationists believe Neanderthal descended from Noah.