Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of tired, outstripped Five-Nines that dropped behind.Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! – An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling,
And flound’ring like a man in fire or lime . . .
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est
Pro patria mori.
Governing Magazine on Indiana DST
I think I’ve read this before, and I may even have linked to it before, but Alan Ehrenhalt, writing for Governing Magazine had an article back in April 2005 analyzing what it is about Daylight Saving Time that gets Hoosiers all worked up.
It goes through the pro-business arguments, and the rebuttal that there is no hard evidence showing companies worry too much about DST when making decisions. It goes through the fact that Indiana’s geographic location makes year around Eastern Standard Time a nice way to make sure the sun goes down at a reasonable hour in the summer and rises at a reasonable hour in the fall and spring. And, it goes through some of the other salient facts about Hoosiers’ century long fight over time.
I thought this part toward the end was fairly interesting:
Still, when powerful people argue this heatedly over what would seem to be an issue of only modest importance, one has to suspect that something larger is involved. In this case, I wonder if Indiana isn’t really having an argument about where in the country it actually belongs. An element of the state’s business elite has always wanted to line up chronometrically and politically with the corporate establishment in New York, the better to plug into global alliances and trade opportunities. And an equally vociferous Hoosier element has always been suspicious of those goals, believing that the state’s homespun Midwestern roots are the most attractive and important part of its self-image. Somehow, the issue of time has become intertwined with that rivalry in a way that has not been true anywhere else in the country
Daniels agenda, DST, and the next two years with Pat Bauer
An interesting article by Mary Beth Schneider in yesterday’s Indianapolis Star on Daniels agenda and the dynamics of the State House now that the Democrats control the House.
Gov. Daniels proposes full-day kindergarten, on which Democrats will likely be receptive, and privatization of the Medicaid delivery system, on which they probably will not. Also: health insurance for low income Hoosiers, a new public infrastructure proposal (the so-called “Commerce Connector” toll loop around Indy – more from stAllio!) , and a ceiling on state spending below incoming revenue.
“There’s been a lot said lately about blue states and red states,” Daniels said. “Well, I don’t know which we are and don’t much care. But we will not be a red-ink state again so long as I am governor.”
Daniels’ rhetoric about state austerity appeals to me. As always, however, I’m sure I’ll have differences of opinion about which spending is worthwhile and which is not. That’s just the nature of the beast.
Speaker, soon to be minority leader, Brian Bosma seems to blame his loss in status on Governor Daniels and the national anti-GOP tide. Significantly, he points to Daylight Saving Time, even over Toll Road privatization, as the toughest vote that made a difference in the election, even over Major Moves. To which I say good. That was a solution looking for a problem. I know the Chamber kept pointing to executives on the east coast who had trouble figuring out their day planners to coordinate meetings with Indiana colleagues, but for most Hoosiers, the time arrangement was working just fine. So, even if we never get Hoosier Standard Time back, at least there were significant consequences for that vote.
Now, we look forward to seeing the Once and Future Speaker, Pat Bauer and Governor Daniels try to get along. The irresistable force versus the immovable object. They’ve said some pretty tough things about each other. Bauer is a long-time politician, and probably understands that the heated rhetoric is part of the game — I think he can harbor a grudge when he feels it’s politically advantageous, but I don’t think he internalizes the grudges such that they’ll prevent him from seizing what he views as an opportunity. Though Daniels has been around politics for a long, long time; he’s relatively new to the elected office thing. We’ll see if he can let bygones be bygones when doing so will let him reach common ground on pieces of his agenda.
2nd Place
Just thought I’d take a look at how the second place finishers did in the Congressional Race. Here they are in order of vote percentage:
#1 – Eric Dickerson (IN-07) – 46.41%
#2 – Chris Chocola (IN-02) – 45.9%
#3 – Tom Hayhurst (IN-03) – 45.7%
#4 – Mike Sodrel (IN-09) – 44.85% (Libertarian Eric Schansberg took 5% of the vote in this race.)
#5 – Barry Welsh (IN-06) – 39.8%
#6 – John Hostettler (IN-08) – 39.33%
#7 – David Sanders (IN-04) – 35.33%
#8 – Katherine Fox Carr (IN-05) – 32.89%
#9 – Mark Leyva (IN-01) – 26.85%
Source: Indiana Secretary of State vote totals as of 11/9/06.
Notable in that list are Eric Dickerson and Tom Hayhurst for putting up such tough fights as challengers without notable support from their respective parties. Also notable is incumbent John Hostettler for getting waxed by such a large margin despite an immense amount of support from his party.
Resisting Inertia on the Indiana Congressional Races
Resisting Inertia has a pretty good run down on Indiana’s 9 Congressional races. Seems pretty much on the money to me.
Still under review: 3 seats in the House of Reps
The Journal & Courier has an article on three contests in the Indiana House of Representatives that are too close to call definitively. At the moment, the Republican candidate in each race appears to have the lead. But, there are enough provisional ballots left to be considered and potentially counted that the results could change. There is also the potential for a recount, but nobody is suggesting that until the provisional ballots have been counted.
For House District 18 (Benton, Newton, White, and Lake counties), a race between Republican Don Lehe and Democrat Myron Sutton, Lehe leads by 26 votes (out of 17,000 cast.) There are still a “large number” of provisional ballots from Lake County.
For House District 97 (Marion Count) Republican Jon Elrod is leading Democrat Ed Mahern by 75 votes. For House District 31 (Grant and Blackford Counties), Republican Timothy Harris is leading Democrat Larry Hile by 16 votes.
If all the leads stand, Democrats will control the Indiana House 51 to 49. If all the leads are reversed (unlikely) the Democrats would control the House 54 to 46.
For
Vindication of Howard Dean
Last night I composed a rather lengthy, link-filled post on the subject of Howard Dean. For some reason it wouldn’t post. I had no problem with other posts, but that one just wouldn’t go. I’d blame Diebold, but after Tuesday night that would be ungracious.
In any event, I recall that upon the election of Howard Dean to be chairman of the Democratic National Committee, there were pundits who promptly declared the Democratic Party to be doomed. He was too “angry.” He wasn’t a good enough fund raiser. He was chasing dreams by pursuing a 50 state strategy; he should only put money into the high probability races.
There were a lot of other factors involved in the Republicans reversal of fortunes — many of which were self-inflicted — but at the very least, we can say that those concern trolls opining on how bad Howard Dean would be for the Democratic Party were very, very wrong.
Oh, and another thing. The Karl Rove/Fred Barnes prediction that “Republican hegemony in America is now expected to last for years, maybe decades” also apparently weren’t so much right.
Lehe/Sutton Race too close to call
Rep. Don Lehe is another representative in a District where Eastern Daylight Time is unpopular who had an opportunity to kill the DST bill but refused to do so. He is currently in a race that is too close to call. He unofficially leads challenger Myron Sutton by 24 votes with all of the provisional ballots left to be counted.
Democratic control of the Indiana House
Mike Smith has an article for the Associated Press discussing the Democratic control of the Indiana House. Because of his decisive vote in the Daylight Saving Time vote after having promised his constituents he would “never” vote for it, I am most pleased that Troy Woodruff lost to Kreg Battles. I am less pleased about the loss of Steve Heim, the other incumbent who appears to be a DST casualty. Rep. Heim’s critical pro-DST vote was one of those where he could have kept the DST bill dead but instead voted in favor of a motion to reconsider. On all the substantive votes, he voted against it. But he enabled Speaker Bosma to take unusual procedural steps that allowed passage even though the vote initially went against DST.
I liked that Rep. Heim actively blogged about the legislative process, and, even where I disagreed with him, he seemed like a reasonable sort.
Now, we’re likely to see some interesting fireworks between Gov. Daniels and Speaker Bauer. Not only do they have policy differences, they also seem to personally dislike each other. It will be the irresistable force against the immovable object.
For the most part, I take a “gridlock is good” approach to state government. If not too many new laws get passed, I probably won’t be terribly upset.
How will the media package this one?
It looks like the Democrats have one a fairly comfortable majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and a very slim one in the Indiana House of Representatives. Control of the U.S. Senate is still under review, but it’s going to be a very slim majority for one or the other. According to the NCSL blog, the Thicket, on the state level Democrats have taken control of:
* Iowa House and Senate
* Minnesota House
* Michigan House
* New Hampshire House and Senate
* Oregon House
* Wisconsin Senate
* Indiana House
I think the message is that the Democrats fielded strong candidates in a lot of districts, but voters weren’t typically voting for the Democratic candidates quite so much as they were voting against the Republican candidates. This isn’t a failing of the Democrats; rather it’s just how it goes for candidates challenging incumbents. But, I suspect we’ll see the media try to package this election, summarizing it with some kind of pat “moral of the story.” In particular, I’m reminded of the supposed ascendancy of the “values voters” in 2004 — and talk of George W. Bush’s mandate. So, I wonder what kind of package this election will get wrapped in.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 512
- 513
- 514
- 515
- 516
- …
- 688
- Next Page »