This poster showing how your federal tax dollars get spent put government spending in perspective.
Legislative Hit & Run
And, no, I’m not talking about the practice of passing bad legislation and hurrying out of town. In this case, it looks like Rep. Mike Murphy — or someone driving his car with legislator’s plates — struck a parked car outside of Ike & Joney’s in downtown Indianapolis before taking off without reporting the collision or leaving insurance information. I’m not a criminal lawyer (and we probably can’t prove Murphy was the driver beyond a reasonable doubt, let alone intoxicated, in any case), but which has the harsher penalties? Knowingly and intentionally leaving the scene of the accident after he was aware of hitting another vehicle; or being intoxicated enough so as to be oblivious to the fact of a collision?
Telcos, the NSA, and the SEC
Kagro X over at Daily Kos paints a chilling picture. He suggests (with links and evidence and stuff) that Qwest CEO Joe Nacchio refused to play ball with the NSA when it wanted to snoop on Americans without warrants and tap into the telecommunications systems to do so. Consequently, the government denies Qwest government contracts and at the same time sics the SEC on Nacchio related to the company’s bad luck (related to the failure to obtain the government contracts.)
Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize
Al Gore along with the UN climate change panelwon the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Certainly the country would have been better with Gore in the White House following the 2000 election, but I think that for him personally, he did a lot better for himself as a private citizen. I have similar thoughts with the flurry of “Will he run for President, now???” articles. Sure, I think he’d do a good job as President, but why would he want to? He’s wealthy, well-liked, and respected now. Even more, he seems to be enjoying what he does.
Honda plants and unions
(H/t to Paul O’Malley for flagging this one). The Wall Street Journal has an interesting article about the Greensburg Honda plant entitled Honda and UAW Clash Over New Factory Jobs. The article discusses the Honda plant’s restriction of applicants to those who live within the 20 counties near Greensburg. The UAW says that the restriction is designed to exclude most of the state’s thousands of laid-off unionized workers. Honda says it’s merely designed to make sure workers live close to the plant and can get to work on time.
According to the WSJ article:
Of the 33 auto, engine and transmission plants in the U.S. that are wholly owned by foreign companies, none have been organized by the UAW, despite repeated attempts. Mainly, foreign auto makers have located plants in Southern states where the UAW has little presence and where right-to-work laws limit union power. When they have ventured into Northern states such as Indiana and Ohio, they have mostly chosen rural locations far from any unionized plants and UAW halls. The moves now are helping the foreign-owned plants begin to lower wage scales.
It used to be that the presence of UAW jobs kept the foreign automakers’ salaries and benefits up, even if the foreign shops weren’t unionized. But now, apparently, with the UAW in decline, foreign manufacturers are decreasing what they offer to workers.
Again, I go to a more generalized question — productivity is way up over the past 30 years. Wages are stagnant. Where is the money going?
Ron Paul
So, why not Ron Paul for the Republicans? I’ll fully admit that I have not followed the GOP nomination process because I’m not all that interested. My vote for President is almost certainly going to a Democrat in 2008 – for the simple reason that the Bush administration has made such a colossal mess that it’s going to take someone from a different party to clean out the stables, even a little bit.
That disclosure notwithstanding, why isn’t Ron Paul regarded as a top tier candidate? It’s purely anecdotal, but I’ve seen more Ron Paul sites in my neck of the woods than any other Presidential candidates. (Which means, maybe 5 – just not a lot of them up at this point.) From what I’ve read, he’s pretty much a paleo-conservative. He’s a small government kind of guy except when it comes to abortion. He’s anti-immigration, anti-war, and apparently pretty popular on the Internet.
Maybe he’s akin to a Howard Dean of the right – speaking truths that are inconvenient to the Republican establishment. I don’t really see what the Republican front-runners have to offer that Paul doesn’t. Giuliani seems a bit on the fascist side for my tastes (and presumably for anyone who favors limited government) and has all of those inconvenient personal difficulties for someone who wants to take up the mantle of the Family Values Party. Fred Thompson is coming out of the gates looking like he’s asleep at the switch. Mitt Romney has his finger firmly planted in the wind to see which way it’s blowing, and for the Religious Right, I have to think the Mormon thing doesn’t sit especially well.
I don’t know, maybe those who are better informed on the Republican Presidency can provide better information about the dynamics at play here.
ACLU v. NSA
The title pretty much says it all — Civil Liberties versus National Security (Ben Franklin, I believe, recommended the former), but for a little light reading you might enjoy the American Civil Liberties Union petition for certiorari (pdf) against the National Security Agency.
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that plaintiffs who have been injured because of government surveillance are precluded from challenging the lawfulness of that surveillance if the government refuses to disclose whether plaintiffs communications have been intercepted.
2. Whether the President possess the authority under Article II of the Constitution to engage in intelligence surveillance within the United States that Congress has expressly prohibited.
State – $23 million short on highway expansion
A project to reroute US 231 to go west of West Lafayette is on hold because the State doesn’t have enough money for the project. The State budgeted $75 million. The cost is now estimated at $98 million. Locals will have to come up with the $23 million for the project to go forward.
The original Major Moves plan was for the project to begin in 2007 and be completed by 2009. Now it won’t get started until at least 2009 and finish in 2011.
The delay in building the road is largely a result of the state’s underestimating how much it will cost to have utilities near the Purdue Airport moved out of the way of the proposed bypass, she said.
The project is also expensive because the state plans to have the road go under Airport Road and the nearby K.B.&S. railroad. To do that, the highway will have to be sunk between 30 and 35 feet below the ground at those two points, Calder said.
Fahey said one way to reduce the cost would be to alter the designs. That could be done by abandoning the plan to build the road below ground, but there is little inclination to make that change, she said.
“You don’t want to build a four-lane highway with at-grade crossings with railroads,” Fahey said.
I guess the Toll Road is out of our hands for the next 73 years. I suppose it would make a certain amount of sense to drag these projects out that long.
Iraq Relativity Theory
I’m working on a new view of government program analysis:
Anything that costs less than $2 or $3 billion per week but is more useful to the average U.S. citizen than the War in Iraq is automatically o.k. What do you think?
Giuliani adviser urges bombing of Iran
One of Rudy Giuliani’s advisers, Norman Podhoretz, is advising President Bush to bomb Iran. Podhoretz is one of the founding fathers of the neoconservative foreign policy thinking that has proven so successful in Iraq.
I suspect the Bush administration’s disparate treatment of Iraq versus North Korea made Iran very anxious to acquire nuclear weapons. Who knows whether you’re going to be the next country to be on the receiving end of trumped up charges about having weapons of mass destruction as a pretext for invasion. The prospect of nuclear war is a horror to be avoided (give the Cold War movie, “The Day After” a watch for a vision of just how unbearable the aftermath might be), but acquisition of nuclear weapons is a rational response to the Bush administration’s foreign policy.
We need to get these maniacs away from the levers of power and begin the long hard work of restoring the United States’ credibility. We want to be militarily fearsome but also viewed as not using our military power except in the most compelling of circumstances.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 198
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- …
- 253
- Next Page »