Apparently the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission is
accepting nominations to replace the vacancy created by the resignation of Commissioner David Hadley. The nominee is required to be someone without a Republican affiliation.
Questionable hook-up
I wanted to recommend this entry:
Kung Fu Monkey: I Still Miss Republicans
Mr. Monkey muses about another one of my favorite bloggers, principled conservative, John Cole, and concludes that he still misses Republicans. Back in December 2004, Kung Fu Monkey took a look at the Republican Party and wondered where all the Republicans went:
Remember Republicans? Sober men in suits, pipes, who’d nod thoughtfully over their latest tract on market-driven fiscal conservatism while grinding out the numbers on rocket science. Remember those serious-looking 1950’s-1960’s science guys in the movies — Republican to a one.
They were the grown-ups. They were the realists. Sure they were a bummer, maaaaan, but on the way to La Revolution
you need somebody to remember where you parked the car. I was never one (nor a Democrat, really, more an agnostic libertarian big on the social contract, but we don’t have a party …), but I genuinely liked them.How did they become the party of fairy dust and make believe? How did they become the anti-science guys? The anti-fact guys? The anti-logic guys?
I’m not talking McCain, Hagel, Snowe, or Lugar, here, the cool hard-ass Republicans who still operate in the real world. I’m talking specifically about the guys running the party right now.
The anti-science stuff started bugging Mr. Cole to the point where he shook off the groupthink, looked around and saw there was a bunch of corruption and incompetence as well. So, anyway, Kung Fu Monkey reviewed the past couple of years and concludes that he still misses Republicans. He concludes that he is no more progressive than he ever was and that Mr. Cole is no less conservative than he ever was, and that “in a country where John Cole and I find ourselves on the same side of the “What the Fuck?” line has gone seriously, seriously off the rails.” (This was written the Saturday before the most recent election, btw.)
Listen, we’ve all had the questionable hook-up. We get it. Bush didn’t seem at all crazy when you met him at the club. And sure you dabbled in faith-based stuff, and maybe his foreign policy was a little naive, but come on — sexy, sexy tax cuts.
But then things got out of control, and kinkier and kinkier and next thing you know you’re in a war with no occupation planning and no exit strategy and being told that’s okay and back off; and people are being tortured, and then not allowed to talk to their lawyers because they might reveal the secrets of their torture; and the one dude who had oversight on the corruption in the war is fired in secret; and you have record deficits and record spending and Congress meeting
over Terry Schiavo and warrantless wiretaps and faith-based anti-science and the end of separation of Church and State and troop families in food banks and the most venal Congress in history and Abramoff and K Street and
Young Republican college students in charge of Iraqi reconstruction and fucking HORSE LAWYERS IN CHARGE OF FEMA and bing bang boom you got a whole American city, just lying there dead, no explanations, no excuses, just stunned at how the hell you got here. Exactly like our questionable hook-ups, just substitute “waitress in Provost”
for “New Orleans” and “all that vodka and blow” for “Hurricane Katrina” —But let’s not get distracted. Point is — questionable hook-ups. We, as ordinary citizens, all know how we get out of this: you stop returning the crazy person’s calls. We
promise never to bring it up when drinking. Several years from now, when everything’s scabbed over the two of us can joke about our mutual lapses in judgment while sharing a fine Rolling Rock beverage.
So, anyway, a fine rant. Go check it out.
Google News Archive
A new little toy: Google News Archive Search. It apparently has news archives from throughout the 20th century. Some of the articles it generates are a little squirrelly because in some cases the optical character recognition doesn’t seem to have worked very well. And, in other cases, I think maybe the scanning process didn’t do a good job of following articles as they moved between colunns. Still, it’s a lot of fun. Apparently my great, great uncle was a Democratic judge in Indianapolis in the 1920s. I had no idea.
I’m just goofing around at the moment, but this seems to be a decent resource for my time zone, daylight saving time obsession. For example, this article from September 1961 tells us:
The Interstate Commerce Commission last July 21 moved the eastern TIME zone It used to follow the Ohio-INDIANA line. Now I it zigzags down the middle of In- diana, putting 51 of the state’s 92 counties in the eastern zone. The remainder of the counties mostly are planning to switch to light TIME Oct. 29. A few fringe areas, however, will go along with eastern TIME. Until two months ago an INDIANA law required DAYLIGHT TIME to end the last Sunday in September.
Searching for Indiana time zone revealed a couple of earlier articles which I could sort of follow but which are too scrambled to blockquote here. They reveal that the Chamber of Commerce was in favor of moving the time zone westward from the Indiana/Ohio line whereas the Farm Bureau was opposed. Some of the discussion revealed anticipation that the time line would be moved to the Indiana/Illinois border or perhaps all the way west to the Mississippi.
The archive also reveals this May 12, 1967 article from Time Magazine which has this to say about Indiana:
Indiana has asked D.O.T. to revise the boundaries so that the entire state falls in the Central Time zone; meanwhile, eastern Indiana will remain on Eastern Standard and thus keep the same time as the western portion, which is on Central Daylight all year long.
Comment problems
I seemed to have screwed up the comments somehow. I’ll try to fix it when time permits.
O.k., I think I’ve fixed the comments and improved it a it. I added a comment preview function. Let me know how it works/whether you like it.
Armistice Day
Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of tired, outstripped Five-Nines that dropped behind.Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! – An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling,
And flound’ring like a man in fire or lime . . .
Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est
Pro patria mori.
Indiana House
I haven’t been able to get good statewide results for Indiana House races. But I’ve seen a few things on the close one.
It looks like in my neck of the woods Democrat Joe Micon will beat repeat challenger Connie Basham.
It looks like Republican Jackie Walorski will hang on to her seat against challenger Robert Kovach.
It looks like Democrat Nancy Dembowski will knock off incumbent Republican Steve Heim who might become a DST/Toll Road casualty. I really respected Rep. Heim’s willingness to blog about what was going on at the General Assembly. That seems like a great tool for letting constituents understand what’s going on day-to-day at the legislature.
Incumbent Troy “I’ll Never Vote for It” Woodruff looks to be having trouble against Kreg Battles.
Update Mary Beth Schneider has a story for the Indianapolis Star suggesting that the Democrats are close to winning control of the Indiana House of Representatives. She says it looks like the Democrats were in danger of losing just one incumbent, Ed Mahern to Republican Jonathon Elrod. Meanwhile, the Republicans looked to lose Steve Heim to Nancy Dembowski; John Smith to Ron Herrell; Billy Bright to David Cheatham; and Troy Woodruff was having trouble with Kreg Battles.
The Democrats need to net 3 seats to take control.
Update 2 District 64 – currently represented by Troy Woodruff goes into Knox, Pike, Daviess, and Gibson counties. I can’t find any results for Gibson County yet. The other three counties have Battles leading 6,103 votes to Woodruff’s 4,238 votes. And, Gibson County broke in favor of the Democratic incumbent John Frenz in 2004 when Woodruff beat Frenz — so Gibson County shouldn’t be a stronghold. However, according to the 2004 results, Gibson County seems to cast about as many votes as the other districts combined, so Woodruff’s defeat probably can’t be taken as a given just yet.
IN-09: Baron Hill wins rubber match against Sodrel
The Indy Star has a headline up saying that Hill has won in Indiana’s 9th District in his re-rematch against Sodrel. I won’t bother linking to it at the moment since the text doesn’t match the headline and they keep shifting text. CBS offered a teaser with the same information. I guess there is some allegation of voter fraud on the part of the Democrats in Monroe County that I suppose could put things on hold for a bit if the margins are too close.
IN-08: Ellsworth defeats Hostettler
Looks like John Hostettler used up his 9 lives already. It’s being projected that he will go down to defeat to Brad Ellsworth in the bloody eighth. I respected him for voting against the war in Iraq and generally voting his conscience. But Hostettler was far too radical with some of his views for my tastes. For example he characterized the Democrats as “demonizing and denigrating Christians.” He was against “divorce on demand.” In an effort to establish fully human life begins at conception, he proposed giving people a child tax credit if they had a miscarriage. And, he was in favor of defunding the U.S. Marshal’s Office in order to prevent them from enforcing judicial orders with which he disagreed.
I think Brad Ellsworth is conservative enough to represent the vast majority of people in the 8th District. But he’s not going to be a wingnut about it.
IN-03: Andrew Kaduk on Mark Souder
Here is an inspired rant against Mark Souder by Andrew Kaduk. The short version is that Souder is no conservative. Other than that I won’t try to summarize it and will simply recommend that folks go read it.
Administrative Note
I migrated to a new host for my blog, so a few of my later posts were lost. If you made any comments to those posts, I apologize. Hopefully the move will have fixed some of the glitches I’ve been experiencing lately.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 229
- 230
- 231
- 232
- 233
- …
- 253
- Next Page »