Politico has an article entitled “The nuking of Dan Coats.” First, a disclosure. I don’t care for Dan Coats’ policies. In a race between him and Evan Bayh, I’d vote for Bayh.
With that out of the way, I find the vigorous pushback against the prospects of his candidacy revealing, and what it reveals annoys me. Politico describes the push:
In the week since Dan Coats announced he was preparing to challenge Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh, Democrats have launched a withering, no-holds-barred assault on the former Republican senator, throwing him off balance and raising questions about whether his prospective candidacy has suffered lasting damage.
. . .
The ferocious barrage — a coordinated effort unleashed by a small core of senior Democratic strategists in Washington, top Bayh political hands, and Indiana Democratic Party officials — has partisans on both sides of the aisle wondering not whether Coats has been bruised by the punches, but whether he will be able to pick himself off the canvas.
Now, when was the last time you heard Senate Democrats described as ferocious about anything? What this tells me is that they are capable of being vigorous and proactive, but choose not to when it comes to actually getting anything done in terms of policies. Challenge a centrist Democrat’s incumbency, and you’re going to get kneecapped. Derail a Democratic policy initiative and they are as helpless and passive as newborn kittens. Sure, there are procedural hurdles in the Senate that don’t apply to the campaign trail, but I guarantee the last year would have played out a lot differently if the Senate Democrats had taken the political crowbars to filibuster supporters the way the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is going after Coats.
Again, it’s not that they can’t. So, it must be that they don’t care to. The Democrats need to get someone like Howard Dean back in position to put some political energy behind policy initiatives instead of just becoming animated when an incumbent is threatened. From my view, it seems the the Democratic base isn’t so much frustrated by policy positions that are too liberal or too conservative, but rather by a passiveness that seems indifferent to actually accomplishing anything. It’s back to the days when Daschle and the Democratic Leadership Council were running the Democratic Party and the party was routinely getting its clocked cleaned by aggressive, energetic Republicans. It wasn’t until Dean stepped up and showed some intestinal fortitude (not liberal, necessarily, just not waffling and passive) that the Democrats got some of their mojo back.