The minutes from the September meeting (PDF) of the Census Data Advisory Committee records a pretty interesting debate on the issue of provisional ballots. The Democrats seemed to be concerned that provisional ballots aren’t counted as quickly or as fully as regular ballots and that a challenge to a citizen’s right to vote will automatically relegate them to provisional vote purgatory with almost no chance of adverse consequences for a challenger who does so maliciously or frivolously. Julia Vaughn of Common Cause Indiana stated that Indiana was among 5 states with the lowest rates of counted provisional ballots. Much of this discussion was in response to a draft bill being considered by the committee:
Senator Craycraft asked Mr. King if the draft was proposing that any challenged voter must vote a provisional ballot. Mr. King responded that Senator Craycraft’s characterization of the draft was accurate.
According to the October 3, 2005 minutes of the Commission on Courts (PDF) Representative Richardson has requested an opinion from the attorney general as to whether garnishees should be considered defendants in small claims and civil cases. At issue is whether Plaintiffs with judgments seeking to garnish wages to collect from Defendants are required to pay the $10 “additional defendant” fee before adding garnishees to the case. Currently, most Clerks of Courts seem to be taking the position that they are defendants and are requiring the fee. However, this is likely out of an abundance of caution in that, if they do not collect a fee they are supposed to, they could find themselves personally liable.
The August 10, 2005 Minutes of the FSSA Evaluation Committee has a lot of discussion of issues in the news just lately about Mitch Roob’s plan to privatize (err, “localize”) FSSA functions. The committee was apparently meeting again today.
If you’re interested in these things, check out LSAs 2005 Study Committees page which has a list of the committees.
Update Mike Smith has AP article stating that the interim committee reviewing BMV issues declined to take any action or make any recommendation about Silverman’s actions shutting down BMV branches. However, they did recommend two drafts, one of which apparently tightens up notice requirements for public hearings and the other of which requires BMV branches that issue photo IDs to remain open on the day before and the day of elections. This last one was proposed by Rep. Rogers as an effort to mitigate to some extent the new requirement that before a citizen can exercise his or her right to vote, he or she must produce a state or federal photo ID.
Leave a Reply