I posted a Twitter comment today where I said:
Been reading about the rise of the Indiana Klan in the 20s (membership rose to 250k). I see plenty of parallels to the Trump movement.
I wanted to elaborate. First of all, I think we all have some fairly specific images when we think of the Ku Klux Klan. I don’t think your average Hoosier Klansman probably fits that image very well. Don’t get me wrong — I think we should still be horrified by the popularity of the movement and what it says about Indiana. But, I don’t think it’s probably fair to impose our present day images on the Hoosiers that joined up.
For one thing, the message was a little more subtle. Klan recruiters like D.C. Stephenson were paid a commission on every new recruit, so they had a tendency to sell whatever the listener wanted to buy. Their primary message was Patriotism and Protestantism. God and country have always been big sellers.
That said, historian James Madison tells us that the Klan’s vision of Patriotism and Protestantism tended to be expressed in negative terms. They were pretty easily used in an “us” versus “them” kind of way. And the Klan always likes to punch down against less privileged members of society. In 1920s Indiana, they were defending against “threats” to god & country like Roman Catholics, the foreign born, Jews, blacks, and the old White Cap enemies: the immoral such as adulterers, gamblers, and drinkers.
Your average white, protestant male (sound like any modern day candidate’s constituency?) was pretty ripe to be sold on the movement. The message I get from several history books is that the electorate was pretty simply exhausted by the social change of the past decades. Advance in technology, immigration, the Progressive movement, and very significantly, World War I had changed the social landscape dramatically. The folks on top of the heap at the beginning of that process — even people who are generally pleasant and do not harbor great stores of ill-will toward others — will tend to tire of the change first since it’s not necessarily bringing them any individual benefits.
The 1920s Klan grew like wildfire. Starting from essentially nothing in 1920 and, by 1925, including something like 30% of native-born white men. On July 4, 1923, the Indiana Klan held a rally in Kokomo, Indiana at which D.C. Stephenson was inducted as the Grand Dragon. The rally is considered the largest in the nation’s history, attended by something like 100,000 Klansmen and their families. Doug Linder describes some of the event as follows:
That night, Stephenson, in his newly-won golden orange robe and hood, enjoyed the conclusion of the “Konklave in Kokoma.” A Klan parade, with robed high Klan officials on horseback and a dozen floats wound its way through town. “Onward Christian Soldiers” blared from a forty-piece marching band. When the parade was over, the crowd moved to Foster Park and sung hymns such as “The Old Rugged Cross” around a sixty-foot high fiery cross. Fireworks streaked through the nighttime sky. Stephenson soaked it all in. He was, he thought, soon destined to be the most powerful man in Indiana.
Now, it wouldn’t be long before Stephenson fell hard and took the Klan with him. (He kidnapped and raped a woman, leading to her death.) But, on that night, he and the Klan were on top.
What brought them there was a change-weary, aggrieved native-born, white male, protestant population. It was a minority of that demographic, but a substantial one coupled with a majority that did not push back hard enough against them. The public statements were often framed in a way that allowed them to plausibly deny the hateful subtext (perhaps even to themselves). Linder, once again:
In fact, Stephenson’s speech that day was entitled “Back to the Constitution.” He denounced political corruption, American imperialism abroad, and called for an end to deficit spending. He ended his hour-long, enthusiastically received talk with the cry, “Where there is no vision, the people perish!” All in all, there was scarcely a phrase in the speech that would embarrass a major party candidate today. There were better places than a huge rally attended by media from several states to deliver the KKK’s anti-Catholic, anti-black, anti-Jewish message.
Stephenson and Trump have the narcissistic demagogue thing in common. If Trump is not successfully opposed, I predict a parallel trajectory with Stephenson — a scandal with roots in his hubris followed by generations-long shame that so many generally decent citizens supported him.
jharp says
Great piece but have to disagree with the closing.
“generations-long shame that so many generally decent citizens supported him.”
“Generally decent citizens” do not support Donald Trump.
Doug Masson says
I understand the sentiment, but I think it’s necessary to come up with explanations for why such figures can get such broad support without having to conclude that massive numbers of people are evil.
Rick Westerman says
Going along with Doug’s comment. I constantly hear from my anti-Trump friends that Trump supporters are sub-human. Well, they do not say ‘sub-human’ but things like ‘stupid’ or ‘not generally decent’. Granted there are people in the world who are stupid or not decent but these are in the very small minority. And yet there are a lot of Trump supporters. Why? To discount these people as somehow below consideration seems to me to be a condescending attitude. Instead we should try to understand why they feel they way that they do.
Doug says
I remember in the wake of 9/11, there was a great resistance to trying to understand why the terrorists did what they did. In the minds of some folks, I think “trying to understand” is part of a slippery slope on the way to excusing, condoning or legitimizing disagreeable ideas or actions.
I don’t happen to agree with that notion. I’m comfortable with understanding and condemning a thing at the same time.
Carlito Brigante says
Right after 9/11, we often heard that the terrorists “hate us for our freedoms.” This is a nonsensical platitude designed to shortcut any consideration of Al Quadea’s motives for the attack. Being duped by a bumper sticker.
If a nation understands the reasons for terrorist attacks on its people, such attacks may be avoided. This does not mean yielding to the terrorist’s demands. This intelligence could be used for predictive purposes or interventional purposes.
jharp says
“Granted there are people in the world who are stupid or not decent but these are in the very small minority.”
The problem is the not decent people convincing the stupid people that they should become team. And it has been working.
And it’s hardly a small minority.
It’s today’s Republican party.
Carlito Brigante says
Great post, Dog. In Criminal Law in law school we read Stephenson v. State, the opinion of the Indiana Supreme Court in an appeal of Stephenson’s murder conviction of Marge Overholt. The issue in the case was proximate cause, concurring cause and intervening cause. The facts were hideously evil and obscene.
I recall reading that there was a small riot involving the Klan in South Bend. Notre Dame students took on some Klansmen. This would be the one and only time in my life that I would say “Go Irish.”
Stuart says
For those inclined to unconditionally and uncritically accept the “America is exceptional” and “America is a Christian nation” demagoguery, their noses should be regularly rubbed in this article. Truly, America has a history of being “exceptional”, and this is one example of it. A huge service to us all.