I suspect Clinton will win Ohio & Texas, but not in ways that get her many more net delegates than Obama. But, with the ever shifting goal posts put out by the Clinton campaign, it’ll be enough to slog on.
VT- Heavily Obama – 60+ %
RI – 55-45 Clinton (too heavily old, Catholic and blue collar for O)
TX – 51-49 Obama (due to the weirdness of their primary caucus. Really who thought that crap up?)
OH – 52-48 – Clinton
He’s still way ahead in delegates, but she’s still claiming that she wins all the Big Dem states. The pressure is on in PA and to include MI and FL. I think that’s a bogus argument, cause he didn’t even compete in those two. Now the real slugfest begins. They have already begun to slime him from the Clinton side. And she really HAS been given a rougher time– but then, any OTHER Candidate that lost 11 str8 woulda been told to get lost.
More to the point… what will either candidate do about the permanent surveillance state about to be gifted to Bush by the House? Yes, it’s yet another Dem capitulation… and this one was demanded by, among others, Indiana’s very own “Bush Dogs” Baron and Ellsworth?
In other words, the President for 2009-2012 might be decided today if Obama continues. I really can’t see McCain beating him.
I suspect Clinton will win Ohio & Texas, but not in ways that get her many more net delegates than Obama. But, with the ever shifting goal posts put out by the Clinton campaign, it’ll be enough to slog on.
I’m gonna wager the following.
VT- Heavily Obama – 60+ %
RI – 55-45 Clinton (too heavily old, Catholic and blue collar for O)
TX – 51-49 Obama (due to the weirdness of their primary caucus. Really who thought that crap up?)
OH – 52-48 – Clinton
He’s still way ahead in delegates, but she’s still claiming that she wins all the Big Dem states. The pressure is on in PA and to include MI and FL. I think that’s a bogus argument, cause he didn’t even compete in those two. Now the real slugfest begins. They have already begun to slime him from the Clinton side. And she really HAS been given a rougher time– but then, any OTHER Candidate that lost 11 str8 woulda been told to get lost.
Hm said:
Question to the Democrats in the room:
Why would you choose the person that only wins the strong Democrat states, assuming your main goal is to defeat the Republican candidate?
Parts of Ohio are under a winter storm warning; especially northwest/Toledo area. Who does this hurt? Details at 11.
More to the point… what will either candidate do about the permanent surveillance state about to be gifted to Bush by the House? Yes, it’s yet another Dem capitulation… and this one was demanded by, among others, Indiana’s very own “Bush Dogs” Baron and Ellsworth?
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/3/233014/2946