Sen. Kruse has introduced SB 34 prohibiting medical services to minors related to gender identity. It contains some exceptions where “the minor has a medically verifiable genetic disorder of sex development, including having: (A) both ovarian and testicular tissue; or (B) external biological characteristics that are ambiguous3 resulting from having a 46,XX karyotype with virilization or 46,XY karyotype with undervirilization.” The other exception is for situations where “(2) The minor has an abnormal sex chromosome structure that has been diagnosed using genetic testing by a physician licensed under IC 25-22.5.” I don’t know what those technical terms mean. But, notably, there is no exception for situations where the minor, the minor’s parents, and the medical provider all agree that the medical services are in the best interest of the minor.
This bill would prohibit the following:
[A health care professional may not] attempt to change,14reinforce, or affirm a minor’s perception of the minor’s own sexual attraction or sexual behavior, or attempt to change, reinforce, or affirm a minor’s gender identity when the identity is inconsistent with the minor’s biological sex, by performing or causing to be performed any of the following procedures on the minor: (1) Castration. (2) Vasectomy. (3) Hysterectomy. (4) Oophorectomy. (5) Metoidioplasty. (6) Orchiectomy. (7) Penectomy. (8) Phalloplasty. (9) Urethroplasty. (10) Vaginoplasty. (11) Mastectomy. (12) Lobotomy. (13) A surgery to remove a healthy organ or body part.
The bill would also prohibit:
[A health care professional may not] attempt to change, reinforce, or affirm a minor’s perception of the minor’s own sexual attraction or sexual behavior, or attempt to change, reinforce, or affirm a minor’s gender identity when that identity is inconsistent with the minor’s biological sex, by engaging in any of the following activities: (1) Prescribing, administering, or furnishing to the minor a drug to stop or delay puberty. (2) Prescribing, administering, or furnishing to a female9minor testosterone or estrogen-suppressing drugs. (3) Prescribing, administering, or furnishing to a male minor estrogen or testosterone-suppressing drugs. (4) Subjecting a minor’s genitals to an electric current. (5) Penetrating the minor’s fingers with needles. (6) Restraining and placing ice on the minor’s hands. (7) Wrapping the minor’s hands in heat coils. (8) Subjecting the minor to an ice bath. (9) Injecting drugs into the minor to induce vomiting. (10) Restraining the minor with ties or harnesses. (11) Inflicting any physical pain or suffering.
Back in the old days, I would have joked about Sen. Kruse going to wilder parties than the ones I get invited to. But I don’t have the heart for it. Questions about gender identity and what to do about it when a person’s identity differs from their biological sex are difficult. I think they’re especially difficult because puberty can be a kind of ticking clock where the release of hormones is going to make the inconsistency more difficult for the person to navigate and also difficult because making the wrong decision — either by taking action or by not taking action — can have significant impacts for the rest of the person’s life. I do not think these questions are ones the General Assembly is well equipped to answer on behalf of these families.
Paddy says
I would be interested to know who wrote this bill for him. They are least a dozen words and 2-3 concepts he doesn’t have the intelligence to grasp.
Doug Masson says
This definitely looks like a cut & paste job. Those terms aren’t likely ones Legislative Services came up with when Sen. Kruse made a bill request.
Joe says
I thought for a split-second this was a bill based on banning conversion therapy. Then I saw which Senator it was from and realized I was mistaken.
That conversion therapy bill was from last year, introduced by Sen. Ford and, unsurprisingly, died in committee.
http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2021/bills/senate/32#document-d10853fb
HoosierDragon says
My first thought was the right-wing bill mill ALEC, but given the nature, I more suspect one of the major Evangelical / conservative Christian legal groups like the ADF.
According to the following article, Kruse proposed (largely) the same bill last legislative session, and it apparently went nowhere. I’m getting the feeling that he introduces bills like this and the creationism bill that he knows won’t get passed to placate the conservative voter base, but sometimes they do get passed.
https://baptistnews.com/article/anti-transgender-bills-introduced-in-more-than-a-dozen-state-legislatures/
Doug Masson says
He does introduce a lot of these types of bills that go nowhere. He also traditionally releases them first — this time of year when very few other bills are available. (There are a couple of other Senators who seem to release early – Lonnie Randolph and Phil Boots come to mind.) I’m not sure what the process is for getting them posted before the first of the year.
Ben Cotton says
The party of small government strikes again. Apart from the ghastly restrictions on kids receiving gender-affirming care (which is shown to reduce suicide rates (so much for “pro-life”, which the GOP never was, of course)), I wonder
1. What’s the deal with the heat/ice things
2. If the provision against inflicting physical pain would outlaw vaccines, IVs, broken bone re-setting, etc etc etc
Doug Masson says
I was wondering whether some of these listed procedures have anything to do with what goes on in the real world or if maybe some of them were thrown in to make things sound scarier.
phil says
Wow the only thing that comes to mind is a Hank Williams song. – Mind Your Own Business
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZH2bmbUTl4