This is a family-friendly blog, so I’ll not say “shit flows downhill” in the headline. Also, I’m a little skittish about using the phrase here at all since it’d be pretty callous to refer to inmates as “shit.” That’s not my intent — rather, I’m referring to the costs of incarceration. Back in 2014, the General Assembly changed the rules so that low level felons would be incarcerated locally, generally in county jails, rather than in state prisons.
According to an AP article:
The state pays jails $35 daily for each of those inmates to cover food and staffing, but the money doesn’t pay for additional jail space. Dozens of Indiana’s 92 counties are studying, actively pursuing or developing expansion plans or are in the midst of building new facilities.
There was also supposedly a plan for the Department of Corrections to evaluate the savings it realized from not having to house these low level felons and the savings would be passed along to the counties to help them pay for the additional burden. But, last I heard (early 2016), the DOC hadn’t identified any savings, despite a 17% reduction in Department of Corrections sentences, amounting to 5,000 fewer inmates. I don’t know if there have been any developments on that front. But, per the AP article, “lawmakers passed a new law earlier this year that tries to address the jail crowding issue, which local officials say has grown since the state sentencing changes took effect in 2014. Counties can now direct a portion of the local income tax rate to go toward correctional and rehabilitation facilities. The legislation requires counties that are building or renovating jails to conduct a feasibility study to examine possible alternatives.”
Reminds me of Caddyshack:
Hey, Lama! Hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know?”
And he says, “Oh, uh, there won’t be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness.”
So I got that goin’ for me, which is nice.
So, there won’t be any money, but the General Assembly has given local officials the opportunity to take the heat for passing a tax increase to fund the DOC’s inmate reduction. Not exactly total consciousness, but I suppose it’s something.
Ben Cotton says
Well at least the counties can raise property taxes to help pay for the cost the state is imposing on them.
Reuben Cummings says
Unless Ben knows something I don’t there is no method to raise property taxes to cover this.
Doug Masson says
Correct, it’s the local income tax rate that can be raised. HB 1263-2018 provides that:
This one is a little different from other income tax rate components in that it can be adopted by the County Council whereas the other rate increases need to be approved by the County Income Tax Council which is made up of representatives from the various political subdivisions in the County in proportion to their populations. In Tippecanoe County, practically speaking, this means that for those other income tax raises (such as, for example, a public safety rate), two of Lafayette, West Lafayette, and Tippecanoe County need to agree.
Ben Cotton says
It was a sarcastic comment on the tendency of the state to foist expenses on the county and city governments while also constraining their ability to raise revenue.
Reuben Cummings says
Gotcha. There is a massive percentage of the population that think counties can simply raise taxes anytime and for anything. I am constantly trying to explain tax levies and limitations to people.
One of the internet’s most glaring weaknesses is the inability to convey sarcasm.